From: Bruce Lilly (blilly@erols.com)
Date: Sun Mar 14 2004 - 17:18:43 CST
Charles Lindsey wrote:
> The more interesting point is whether to say anything about the case where
> a user follows up to two or more predecessors (as John Stanley frequently
> does in this thread). I posted a suggestion about this a few days back,
> but nobody commented (essentially, I suggested that all you wanted was
> that followups should occur later in the References header than any
> precursor).
The important thing is that the multiple message-ids of the multiple
immediate predecessors should be in the In-Reply-To field.
#################################################################
#################################################################
#################################################################
#####
#####
#####
#################################################################
#################################################################
#################################################################