From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (Shmuel+gen@patriot.net)
Date: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 07:54:48 CST
In <Pine.LNX.4.21.0403171653340.23480-100000@deathstar.prodigy.com>,
on 03/17/2004
at 04:57 PM, Usenet News Support <support@deathstar.prodigy.com>
said:
>To: "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <Shmuel+gen@patriot.net>
>cc: usenet-format@landfield.com
Why do I need two copies? Please don't do that.
>That last sentence strikes me as highly unlikely. I can't think of a
>reason why we would EVER define the Subject as "unstructured, but may
>not contain the subject of a previous article with "Re:"
>prepended."
You're confusing what the field may contain with what a followup agent
may put their without instructions from the user. My text doesn't
prohibit the user from putting in Re: if he wishes, or even discourage
him from doing it.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)