From: Henry Spencer (henry@spsystems.net)
Date: Sat Mar 20 2004 - 14:43:28 CST
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Bruce Lilly wrote:
> But the document provides for procedures, specifically a review process
> and IESG oversight, and it is unlikely that an incompatible definition
> of Subject or any other RFC 2822 field would be approved for permanent
> registration without some extraordinary justification.
It's your opinion, not a self-evident fact, that this usage is incompatible
and hence (perhaps) unlikely to be approved.
Henry Spencer
henry@spsystems.net