From: Nick Boalch (n.g.boalch@durham.ac.uk)
Date: Sat May 01 2004 - 05:17:42 CDT
Bruce Lilly wrote:
>> I wish you would stop using the fact that the Chairs appear to be absent
>> to obstruct the process of producing this draft.
>
> If you wish to state your reasons for your positions, by all means feel
> free to do so. However, kindly do not purport to attribute motives to
> my actions, particularly where I have given clear rationale for my objections
> to Charles' wording and to his repeated attempts to bully and badger WG
> members into accepting his partisan text.
I'm sorry, Bruce, but you and John are clearly in a minority in your
unwillingness to accept the text as proposed.
I would prefer mandating "Re: ", but I am prepared to accept the text that
Charles has proposed. Seth prefers mandating "Re: ", but is prepared to accept
the text that Charles has proposed. Other people prefer that, or perhaps other
solutions, but are prepared to accept the text that Charles has proposed.
You and John, on the other hand, appear not to be prepared to make any kind of
compromise in your position so that we can get off this issue and move on.
But, whether there is a Chair or not able to rule on it, we need to do that.
Cheers,
N.
-- Nick Boalch, Research Student School of Modern European Languages Tel: +44 (0) 191 334 5780 University of Durham Fax: +44 (0) 191 334 5770 New Elvet, Durham DH1 3JT, UK WWW: http://nick.frejol.org/