From: Bruce Lilly (blilly@erols.com)
Date: Sat May 01 2004 - 14:06:19 CDT
Charles Lindsey wrote:
> In <Pine.LNX.4.53.0404291208270.21517@a.shell.peak.org> John Stanley <stanley@peak.org> writes:
>
>
>>I think we've already had a consensus for deprecating the hack, just not
>>agreement on when a formal statement of such should appear or how strong
>>it should be. I think the fact that it is recognized as a hack expresses
>>the sentiment that it ought to be deprecated in the long run.
>
>
> No, we do not have a consensus for deprecating the hack. Quite a lot of
> people don't want to deprecate it, and indeed want to promote it. But, in
> the interests of reaching a consensus they are prepared to accept the
> proposed compromise in which the hack is neither deprecated nor promoted.
> You, on the contrary, are not prepared to accept any compromise and
> instead demand that it be deprecated.
Still trying to put words in John's mouth, in the interest of
promoting your partisan text, I see.
#################################################################
#################################################################
#################################################################
#####
#####
#####
#################################################################
#################################################################
#################################################################