From: Seth Breidbart (sethb@panix.com)
Date: Sun May 02 2004 - 01:45:00 CDT
Bruce Lilly <blilly@erols.com> wrote:
> Bull. You are proceeding on a false premise, which has been
> explained to you on multiple occasions. You are using this false
> "consensus" as a smokescreen to promote your personal preferences in
> spite of substantive objections (which you have refused to
> addressed) raised by WG members.
Given that any proposed text which disparages, deprecates, or
prohibits defaulting with "Re: " will have _more_ objections than text
which encourages or allows it (I don't support requiring it), what
would you propose?
Seth