From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Date: Mon May 03 2004 - 06:49:29 CDT
In <4093F3D3.2090005@erols.com> Bruce Lilly <blilly@erols.com> writes:
>Charles Lindsey wrote:
>> In <200404291400.i3TDxx5U012243@jefferson.patriot.net> "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <Shmuel+gen@patriot.net> writes:
>>>There is no "implied SHOULD NOT" in RFC2119. Either it's there or it
>>>isn't.
>>
>>
>> It is a matter of simple logic. "SHOULD DO X" implies "SHOULD NOT DO NOT
>> X".
>Your "logic" is flawed. You seem to have persistent trouble with the
>"fallacy of the excluded middle".
In the present matter, there is no middle to exclude.
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5