From: Bruce Lilly (blilly@erols.com)
Date: Tue May 04 2004 - 21:30:39 CDT
Charles Lindsey wrote:
> In <4093F3D3.2090005@erols.com> Bruce Lilly <blilly@erols.com> writes:
>
>
>>Charles Lindsey wrote:
>>
>>>In <200404291400.i3TDxx5U012243@jefferson.patriot.net> "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <Shmuel+gen@patriot.net> writes:
>
>
>>>>There is no "implied SHOULD NOT" in RFC2119. Either it's there or it
>>>>isn't.
>>>
>>>
>>>It is a matter of simple logic. "SHOULD DO X" implies "SHOULD NOT DO NOT
>>>X".
>
>
>>Your "logic" is flawed. You seem to have persistent trouble with the
>>"fallacy of the excluded middle".
>
>
> In the present matter, there is no middle to exclude.
Charles, get a clue. "You SHOULD comb your hair" absolutely, positively
does *NOT* imply "you SHOULD NOT brush your teeth".