From: Bruce Lilly (blilly@erols.com)
Date: Tue May 04 2004 - 21:34:01 CDT
Henry Spencer wrote:
> On Mon, 3 May 2004, Bruce Lilly wrote:
>
>>>>As "Re:" has nothing to do with the defined syntax or semantics of
>>>>the Subject field...
>>>
>>>That is your belief, not a self-evident fact...
>>
>>We've been over this...
>
>
> Indeed we have, and your arguments haven't been convincing; there is no
> need to repeat them yet again. However much you believe this to be the
> only viable interpretation, others disagree and are likely to continue
> disagreeing.
You're getting silly. The syntax and semantics are clearly defined. The
syntax is unstructured; that is what RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 850, RFC 1036,
and our draft all say. If you disagree with that definition, you're wrong.
Likewise for the semantics.