From: Nick Boalch (n.g.boalch@durham.ac.uk)
Date: Wed May 05 2004 - 10:15:00 CDT
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:
>> In the original version it reads much like an extension of the section
>> detailing its cons,
>
> No, it presented both the pros and the cons. It took about the same
> amount of text for each.
And seeing as it was identified as the section of the text dealing with the
merits of prepending "Re: " (there was already a substantial section dealing
with the cons) I thought that was inappropriate.
Cheers,
N.
-- Nick Boalch, Research Student School of Modern European Languages Tel: +44 (0) 191 334 5780 University of Durham Fax: +44 (0) 191 334 5770 New Elvet, Durham DH1 3JT, UK WWW: http://nick.frejol.org/