Archive of ietf-usefor, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for ietf-usefor

Page 8 of 9
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Charles Lindsey, 06/08/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Charles Lindsey, 06/08/2005
#1029: USEFOR 3.2.2 References: Should comments be a MUST NOT?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/08/2005
#1028 USEFOR 3.1.2: What zones should be on the MUST accept list?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/08/2005
#1022 Summary: Should dot be permitted in phrases?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/08/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Frank Ellermann, 06/08/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Frank Ellermann, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/07/2005
Re: #1022: USEFOR 2.1 obs-phrase: Should dot be permitted in phrases?, Frank Ellermann, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Frank Ellermann, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Frank Ellermann, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Frank Ellermann, 06/07/2005
Re: #1022: USEFOR 2.1 obs-phrase: Should dot be permitted in phrases?, Russ Allbery, 06/07/2005
Re: #1022: USEFOR 2.1 obs-phrase: Should dot be permitted in phrases?, Frank Ellermann, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Bruce Lilly, 06/07/2005
Re: CFWS in References header, Bruce Lilly, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Russ Allbery, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Bruce Lilly, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Bruce Lilly, 06/07/2005
Re: CFWS in References header, Russ Allbery, 06/07/2005
Re: #1022: USEFOR 2.1 obs-phrase: Should dot be permitted in phrases?, Russ Allbery, 06/07/2005
Re: OT: "UT", Russ Allbery, 06/07/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Russ Allbery, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Forrest J. Cavalier III, 06/07/2005
OT: "UT", Bruce Lilly, 06/07/2005
Re: #1022: USEFOR 2.1 obs-phrase: Should dot be permitted in phrases?, Bruce Lilly, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Charles Lindsey, 06/07/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Charles Lindsey, 06/07/2005
Re: #1022: USEFOR 2.1 obs-phrase: Should dot be permitted in phrases?, Charles Lindsey, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Charles Lindsey, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Forrest J. Cavalier III, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Charles Lindsey, 06/07/2005
Re: CFWS in References header, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/07/2005
Re: CFWS in References header, Forrest J. Cavalier III, 06/07/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/07/2005
CFWS in References header, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/07/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/07/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Frank Ellermann, 06/06/2005
OT: EST (was: #1022: USEFOR 2.1 obs-phrase: Should dot be permitted in phrases?), Frank Ellermann, 06/06/2005
Re: #1022: USEFOR 2.1 obs-phrase: Should dot be permitted in phrases?, Russ Allbery, 06/06/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Russ Allbery, 06/06/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Frank Ellermann, 06/06/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Frank Ellermann, 06/06/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Charles Lindsey, 06/06/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Charles Lindsey, 06/06/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Charles Lindsey, 06/06/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Charles Lindsey, 06/06/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Charles Lindsey, 06/06/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Charles Lindsey, 06/06/2005
Re: #1022: USEFOR 2.1 obs-phrase: Should dot be permitted in phrases?, Charles Lindsey, 06/06/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Charles Lindsey, 06/06/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Charles Lindsey, 06/06/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Charles Lindsey, 06/06/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Bruce Lilly, 06/05/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Frank Ellermann, 06/03/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Henry Spencer, 06/03/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Frank Ellermann, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Eivind Tagseth, 06/03/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Bruce Lilly, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", John Stanley, 06/03/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Henry Spencer, 06/03/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Bruce Lilly, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Bruce Lilly, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Frank Ellermann, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Forrest J. Cavalier III, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06/03/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Frank Ellermann, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Seth Breidbart, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Henry Spencer, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", John Stanley, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Frank Ellermann, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", John Stanley, 06/03/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Henry Spencer, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Forrest J. Cavalier III, 06/03/2005
Re: You critiqued USEPRO....Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Forrest J. Cavalier III, 06/03/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Bruce Lilly, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Bruce Lilly, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Seth Breidbart, 06/03/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Bruce Lilly, 06/03/2005
You critiqued USEPRO....Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Forrest J. Cavalier III, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Forrest J. Cavalier III, 06/03/2005
Re: #1022: USEFOR 2.1 obs-phrase: Should dot be permitted in phrases?, Bruce Lilly, 06/03/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Russ Allbery, 06/03/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Russ Allbery, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Charles Lindsey, 06/03/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Henry Spencer, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Charles Lindsey, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Bruce Lilly, 06/03/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Charles Lindsey, 06/03/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Charles Lindsey, 06/03/2005
Re: IMAP definitions on threading, Charles Lindsey, 06/03/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Charles Lindsey, 06/03/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Charles Lindsey, 06/03/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Charles Lindsey, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Charles Lindsey, 06/03/2005
Re: #1022: USEFOR 2.1 obs-phrase: Should dot be permitted in phrases?, Charles Lindsey, 06/03/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Forrest J. Cavalier III, 06/02/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Russ Allbery, 06/02/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Forrest J. Cavalier III, 06/02/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/02/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/02/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Seth Breidbart, 06/02/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Forrest J. Cavalier III, 06/02/2005
#1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", John Stanley, 06/02/2005
Re: IMAP definitions on threading, John Stanley, 06/02/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06/02/2005
#1022: USEFOR 2.1 obs-phrase: Should dot be permitted in phrases?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/02/2005
#1008 USEFOR 1.5: Suggested language on "followup", Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/02/2005
Re: IMAP definitions on threading, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/02/2005
Re: encoded words in an obs-phrase, Frank Ellermann, 06/02/2005
Re: encoded words in an obs-phrase, Bruce Lilly, 06/02/2005
IMAP definitions on threading, John Stanley, 06/02/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Seth Breidbart, 06/02/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Frank Ellermann, 06/02/2005
Re: Injection-Info issues, Russ Allbery, 06/02/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Russ Allbery, 06/02/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/02/2005
Injection-Info issues, Charles Lindsey, 06/02/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-04.txt, Frank Ellermann, 06/02/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06/02/2005
IMAP definitions on threading (Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/02/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Frank Ellermann, 06/02/2005
Re: Path header - suggested text, Frank Ellermann, 06/02/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Charles Lindsey, 06/02/2005
Re: encoded words in an obs-phrase (was: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor), Charles Lindsey, 06/02/2005
Re: Misc. ABNF nits, Charles Lindsey, 06/02/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Charles Lindsey, 06/02/2005
Re: encoded words in an obs-phrase, Frank Ellermann, 06/01/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, John Stanley, 06/01/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06/01/2005
Path header - suggested text, Charles Lindsey, 06/01/2005
Re: Misc. ABNF nits, Frank Ellermann, 06/01/2005
Re: encoded words in an obs-phrase (was: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor), Bruce Lilly, 06/01/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far,, John Stanley, 06/01/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, John Stanley, 06/01/2005
Re: Misc. ABNF nits, Alexey Melnikov, 06/01/2005
Re: Misc. ABNF nits, Frank Ellermann, 06/01/2005
encoded words in an obs-phrase (was: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor), Frank Ellermann, 06/01/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Richard Clayton, 06/01/2005
Re: Misc. ABNF nits, Charles Lindsey, 06/01/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Charles Lindsey, 06/01/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Charles H. Lindsey, 06/01/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06/01/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Eivind Tagseth, 06/01/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06/01/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/01/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Eivind Tagseth, 06/01/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05/31/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Frank Ellermann, 05/31/2005
Re: Misc. ABNF nits, Frank Ellermann, 05/31/2005
Re: Misc. ABNF nits, Henry Spencer, 05/31/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Frank Ellermann, 05/31/2005
Re: Misc. ABNF nits, Frank Ellermann, 05/31/2005
#1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, John Stanley, 05/31/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Charles Lindsey, 05/31/2005
Re: Misc. ABNF nits, Charles Lindsey, 05/31/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Frank Ellermann, 05/30/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05/30/2005
Re: Misc. ABNF nits, Frank Ellermann, 05/30/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Charles Lindsey, 05/30/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Charles Lindsey, 05/30/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Charles Lindsey, 05/30/2005
Re: Misc. ABNF nits (was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-04.txt), Charles Lindsey, 05/30/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: relation between a followup and a References: he, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05/30/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Frank Ellermann, 05/29/2005
Misc. ABNF nits (was: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-04.txt), Frank Ellermann, 05/29/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: relation between a followup and a References: he, Kai Henningsen, 05/29/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Forrest J. Cavalier III, 05/27/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Richard Clayton, 05/27/2005
#1008 USEFOR 1.5 "followup": summary so far, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05/27/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: relation between a followup and a References: header?, Charles Lindsey, 05/27/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: relation between a followup and a References: header?, Charles Lindsey, 05/27/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-04.txt, Charles Lindsey, 05/27/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: relation between a followup and a References: header?, Forrest J. Cavalier III, 05/26/2005
#1008 USEFOR 1.5: relation between a followup and a References: header?, John Stanley, 05/26/2005
Re: New Resource: Cross-linked sections with diffs, Frank Ellermann, 05/26/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: relation between a followup and a References: header?, Eivind Tagseth, 05/26/2005
New Resource: Cross-linked sections with diffs, Forrest J. Cavalier III, 05/26/2005
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-04.txt, Scott Hollenbeck, 05/26/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-04.txt, Frank Ellermann, 05/26/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Richard Clayton, 05/26/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: relation between a followup and a References: header?, Russ Allbery, 05/26/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: relation between a followup and a References: header?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05/26/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: relation between a followup and a References: header?, Seth Breidbart, 05/26/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: relation between a followup and a References:header?, Frank Ellermann, 05/26/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Seth Breidbart, 05/26/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: relation between a followup and a References: header?, Forrest J. Cavalier III, 05/26/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: relation between a followup and a References: header?, Richard Clayton, 05/26/2005
Re: #1008 USEFOR 1.5: relation between a followup and a References: header?, Henry Spencer, 05/26/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Henry Spencer, 05/26/2005
#1008 USEFOR 1.5: relation between a followup and a References: header?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05/26/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 05/26/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-04.txt, Charles Lindsey, 05/26/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05/26/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Eivind Tagseth, 05/25/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Sebastian Brocks, 05/25/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, John Stanley, 05/25/2005
Administrativia (Re: Suggested References texts), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05/25/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Eivind Tagseth, 05/25/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Eivind Tagseth, 05/25/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Richard Clayton, 05/25/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Seth Breidbart, 05/25/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Henry Spencer, 05/25/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, John Stanley, 05/25/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-04.txt, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05/25/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 05/25/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-04.txt, Frank Ellermann, 05/24/2005
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-04.txt, Internet-Drafts, 05/24/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, John Stanley, 05/24/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Forrest J. Cavalier III, 05/24/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05/24/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, John Stanley, 05/23/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05/23/2005
Re: Status request: Who's following this group?, John Stanley, 05/23/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, John Stanley, 05/23/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 05/23/2005
Re: Fixed, Charles Lindsey, 05/23/2005
Poll results, membership and commitment, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05/22/2005
Re: Fixed, Henry Spencer, 05/21/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Henry Spencer, 05/21/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Frank Ellermann, 05/21/2005
Re: Fixed, Frank Ellermann, 05/21/2005
Re: Fixed, Charles Lindsey, 05/20/2005
Re: Case sensitivity: Clear enough? (Re: Fixed), Charles Lindsey, 05/20/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 05/20/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Frank Ellermann, 05/19/2005
Re: Fixed, Henry Spencer, 05/19/2005
Re: Fixed, Russ Allbery, 05/19/2005
Re: Fixed, Charles Lindsey, 05/19/2005
Re: Additional WG chair for the USEFOR working group, Charles Lindsey, 05/19/2005
Re: Fixed, Charles Lindsey, 05/19/2005
Re: Case sensitivity: Clear enough?, Frank Ellermann, 05/19/2005
Re: Case sensitivity: Clear enough? (Re: Fixed), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05/19/2005
USEFOR ABNF check, Alexey Melnikov, 05/19/2005
Case sensitivity: Clear enough? (Re: Fixed), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05/19/2005
Re: Fixed, Frank Ellermann, 05/19/2005
RT (Re: Additional WG chair for the USEFOR working group), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05/18/2005
Re: Fixed, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05/18/2005
Re: Fixed, Frank Ellermann, 05/18/2005
Re: Additional WG chair for the USEFOR working group, Frank Ellermann, 05/18/2005
Re: Fixed, Henry Spencer, 05/18/2005
Re: Fixed, Russ Allbery, 05/18/2005
Re: Fixed, Seth Breidbart, 05/18/2005
Re: Fixed, Russ Allbery, 05/18/2005
Re: Fixed, Henry Spencer, 05/18/2005
Status request: Who's following this group?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05/18/2005
Additional WG chair for the USEFOR working group, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05/18/2005
Re: Fixed, Charles Lindsey, 05/18/2005
Re: Fixed (was: Broken Message-ID syntax), Charles Lindsey, 05/18/2005
Re: Path header: suggested texts, Charles Lindsey, 05/18/2005
Re: Fixed, Frank Ellermann, 05/17/2005
Re: Fixed (was: Broken Message-ID syntax), Seth Breidbart, 05/17/2005
Re: Fixed (was: Broken Message-ID syntax), Charles Lindsey, 05/17/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Charles Lindsey, 05/17/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 05/17/2005
Re: More pretty graphs, Bill Fenner, 05/17/2005
Re: Path header: suggested texts, Alexey Melnikov, 05/17/2005
RE: Path header: suggested texts, Scott Hollenbeck, 05/17/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 05/17/2005
Re: Path header: suggested texts, Charles Lindsey, 05/17/2005
Re: More pretty graphs, Frank Ellermann, 05/17/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Frank Ellermann, 05/17/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, John Stanley, 05/16/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Alexey Melnikov, 05/16/2005
Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 05/16/2005
Re: Path header: suggested texts, Alexey Melnikov, 05/15/2005
Re: CFWS, Frank Ellermann, 05/09/2005
Re: 2045 ABNF, Frank Ellermann, 05/09/2005
Re: Path header: suggested texts, Frank Ellermann, 05/09/2005
Re: 2045 ABNF, Charles Lindsey, 05/09/2005
Re: CMsg in Subject headers, Charles Lindsey, 05/09/2005
Re: CFWS, Charles Lindsey, 05/09/2005
Re: Path header: suggested texts, Charles Lindsey, 05/09/2005
Re: 2045 ABNF, Frank Ellermann, 05/08/2005
Re: Path header: suggested texts, Frank Ellermann, 05/08/2005
Re: CFWS, Frank Ellermann, 05/06/2005
Re: CMsg in Subject headers, Russ Allbery, 05/06/2005
Path header: suggested texts, Charles Lindsey, 05/06/2005
Re: CFWS, Charles Lindsey, 05/06/2005
Re: 2045 ABNF, Charles Lindsey, 05/06/2005
Re: CMsg in Subject headers, Charles Lindsey, 05/06/2005
Re: CMsg in Subject headers, Charles Lindsey, 05/06/2005
Re: CFWS, Kai Henningsen, 05/06/2005
Re: CMsg in Subject headers, Russ Allbery, 05/05/2005
Re: CMsg in Subject headers, Frank Ellermann, 05/05/2005
Re: 2045 ABNF, Frank Ellermann, 05/05/2005
Re: CFWS, Frank Ellermann, 05/05/2005
Re: Cmsg, Russ Allbery, 05/05/2005
Re: Cmsg, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05/05/2005
Re: CFWS, Russ Allbery, 05/05/2005
Re: CFWS, Forrest J. Cavalier III, 05/05/2005
Re: CFWS, Russ Allbery, 05/05/2005
Re: CMsg in Subject headers (was Obsolete vs. obsolescent), Henry Spencer, 05/05/2005
Re: 2045 ABNF, Charles Lindsey, 05/05/2005
Cmsg (was Obsolete vs. obsolescent), Charles Lindsey, 05/05/2005
CMsg in Subject headers (was Obsolete vs. obsolescent), Charles Lindsey, 05/05/2005
Re: CFWS, Charles Lindsey, 05/05/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Henry Spencer, 05/04/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05/04/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Russ Allbery, 05/04/2005
Re: CFWS, Frank Ellermann, 05/04/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Frank Ellermann, 05/04/2005
Re: 2045 ABNF, Frank Ellermann, 05/04/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Russ Allbery, 05/04/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Charles Lindsey, 05/04/2005
Re: ***SPAM-3*** Re: 2045 ABNF, Charles Lindsey, 05/04/2005
Re: ***SPAM-3*** Re: CFWS, Charles Lindsey, 05/04/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Russ Allbery, 05/03/2005
Re: CFWS, Russ Allbery, 05/03/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Charles Lindsey, 05/03/2005
Re: CFWS, Charles Lindsey, 05/03/2005
Re: 2045 ABNF, Frank Ellermann, 05/02/2005
Re: Again broken, Frank Ellermann, 05/02/2005
Re: CFWS, Frank Ellermann, 05/02/2005
Re: CFWS, Russ Allbery, 05/02/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Frank Ellermann, 05/02/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Russ Allbery, 05/02/2005
Re: CFWS (was: Again broken), Charles Lindsey, 05/02/2005
Re: Again broken, Charles Lindsey, 05/02/2005
Re: Again broken, Charles Lindsey, 05/02/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Charles Lindsey, 05/02/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 05/02/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 05/02/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 05/02/2005
Re: 2045 ABNF (was: Again broken), Charles Lindsey, 05/02/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 04/30/2005
2045 ABNF (was: Again broken), Frank Ellermann, 04/29/2005
Re: Again broken, Frank Ellermann, 04/29/2005
CFWS (was: Again broken), Frank Ellermann, 04/29/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Frank Ellermann, 04/29/2005
Re: Again broken, Forrest J. Cavalier III, 04/29/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Russ Allbery, 04/29/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Russ Allbery, 04/29/2005
Re: Again broken, Charles Lindsey, 04/29/2005
Re: Again broken, Charles Lindsey, 04/29/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Charles Lindsey, 04/29/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 04/29/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 04/29/2005
Re: Again broken, Russ Allbery, 04/28/2005
Re: Again broken, Frank Ellermann, 04/28/2005
Re: Fixed, Frank Ellermann, 04/28/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Russ Allbery, 04/28/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Frank Ellermann, 04/28/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Russ Allbery, 04/28/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Frank Ellermann, 04/28/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Russ Allbery, 04/28/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 04/28/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), Charles Lindsey, 04/28/2005
Re: Fixed, Charles Lindsey, 04/28/2005
Re: Again broken (was: Fixed), Charles Lindsey, 04/28/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Charles Lindsey, 04/28/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 04/28/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 04/28/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Frank Ellermann, 04/28/2005
News headers (was References), Charles Lindsey, 04/28/2005
Re: References, Frank Ellermann, 04/28/2005
Re: References, Charles Lindsey, 04/28/2005
Re: References, Charles Lindsey, 04/28/2005
Re: References, Frank Ellermann, 04/28/2005
Re: References, John Stanley, 04/27/2005
Re: References, John Stanley, 04/27/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), John Stanley, 04/27/2005
Re: References, Alexey Melnikov, 04/27/2005
Re: References, Alexey Melnikov, 04/27/2005
Re: References, Ken Murchison, 04/27/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Russ Allbery, 04/27/2005
Re: References, Russ Allbery, 04/27/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, John Stanley, 04/27/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Russ Allbery, 04/27/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), Seth Breidbart, 04/27/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), Richard Clayton, 04/27/2005
Re: References, John Stanley, 04/27/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), John Stanley, 04/27/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Forrest J. Cavalier III, 04/27/2005
Re: References, John Stanley, 04/27/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, John Stanley, 04/27/2005
Re: References, Charles Lindsey, 04/27/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 04/27/2005
Re: References, Forrest J. Cavalier III, 04/27/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), Richard Clayton, 04/27/2005
Re: Fixed, Frank Ellermann, 04/27/2005
Again broken (was: Fixed), Frank Ellermann, 04/27/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Frank Ellermann, 04/27/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Frank Ellermann, 04/27/2005
Re: References, Frank Ellermann, 04/27/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), John Stanley, 04/26/2005
Re: References, Alexey Melnikov, 04/26/2005
Re: References, John Stanley, 04/26/2005
Suggested References texts, John Stanley, 04/26/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Russ Allbery, 04/26/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), Ken Murchison, 04/26/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), John Stanley, 04/26/2005
Re: Suggested References texts, Forrest J. Cavalier III, 04/26/2005
Re: References, Ken Murchison, 04/26/2005
Suggested References texts, Charles Lindsey, 04/26/2005
Re: References, Ken Murchison, 04/26/2005
Re: References, Ken Murchison, 04/26/2005
Re: References, Ken Murchison, 04/26/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), Ken Murchison, 04/26/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Ken Murchison, 04/26/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Ken Murchison, 04/26/2005
Re: Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Ken Murchison, 04/26/2005
Re: References, John Stanley, 04/25/2005
Re: Fixed (was: Broken Message-ID syntax), Charles Lindsey, 04/25/2005
Re: References, Charles Lindsey, 04/25/2005
Re: References, Charles Lindsey, 04/25/2005
Re: Obsolete vs. obsolescent, Alexey Melnikov, 04/24/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), Alexey Melnikov, 04/24/2005
Re: Fixed (was: Broken Message-ID syntax), Alexey Melnikov, 04/24/2005
Obsolete vs. obsolescent (was: Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt), Frank Ellermann, 04/22/2005
Re: References, John Stanley, 04/22/2005
Re: References, Forrest J. Cavalier III, 04/22/2005
Re: References, John Stanley, 04/22/2005
Re: References, John Stanley, 04/22/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), John Stanley, 04/22/2005
Re: References, Charles Lindsey, 04/22/2005
Re: Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Charles Lindsey, 04/22/2005
Re: References, Russ Allbery, 04/21/2005
Re: References, Frank Ellermann, 04/21/2005
Re: References, Frank Ellermann, 04/21/2005
Re: References, Russ Allbery, 04/21/2005
Re: Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Russ Allbery, 04/21/2005
References, John Stanley, 04/21/2005
Re: References, Charles Lindsey, 04/21/2005
Re: References (was: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd)), Charles Lindsey, 04/21/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), Charles Lindsey, 04/21/2005
Re: Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Charles Lindsey, 04/21/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), Sebastian Brocks, 04/21/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), Russ Allbery, 04/20/2005
Re: References, Russ Allbery, 04/20/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), John Stanley, 04/20/2005
References (was: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd)), Frank Ellermann, 04/20/2005
Re: Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Russ Allbery, 04/20/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Charles Lindsey, 04/20/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Charles Lindsey, 04/20/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), Charles Lindsey, 04/20/2005
Re: Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Charles Lindsey, 04/20/2005
Re: Fixed (was: Broken Message-ID syntax), Charles Lindsey, 04/20/2005
Re: Path header delimiters, Henry Spencer, 04/17/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Alexey Melnikov, 04/17/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, John Stanley, 04/13/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor (fwd), John Stanley, 04/13/2005
Fixed (was: Broken Message-ID syntax), Frank Ellermann, 04/13/2005
Re: Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Russ Allbery, 04/13/2005
Re: Broken Message-ID syntax, Charles Lindsey, 04/13/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Charles Lindsey, 04/13/2005
Re: Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Charles Lindsey, 04/13/2005
Re: Path header delimiters, Charles Lindsey, 04/13/2005
Re: Broken Message-ID syntax, Frank Ellermann, 04/12/2005
Re: Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Richard Clayton, 04/12/2005
Re: Path header delimiters, Russ Allbery, 04/12/2005
Re: Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Russ Allbery, 04/12/2005
Re: Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Russ Allbery, 04/12/2005
Re: Path header delimiters, Seth Breidbart, 04/12/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Alexey Melnikov, 04/12/2005
Re: Path header delimiters, Charles Lindsey, 04/12/2005
Re: Broken Message-ID syntax, Charles Lindsey, 04/12/2005
Re: Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Charles Lindsey, 04/12/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Charles Lindsey, 04/12/2005
Re: Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Alexey Melnikov, 04/12/2005
Re: Path header delimiters, Frank Ellermann, 04/11/2005
Re: Path header delimiters, Henry Spencer, 04/11/2005
Re: Path header delimiters, Frank Ellermann, 04/11/2005
Re: Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Russ Allbery, 04/11/2005
Re: Issues outstanding, John Stanley, 04/11/2005
Re: Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, John Stanley, 04/11/2005
Re: Path header delimiters, Henry Spencer, 04/11/2005
Re: Broken Message-ID syntax, Frank Ellermann, 04/11/2005
Re: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-useage-01.txt, Charles Lindsey, 04/11/2005
Re: Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Charles Lindsey, 04/11/2005
Re: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-useage-01.txt, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 04/11/2005
Fwd: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Charles Lindsey, 04/11/2005
Re: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-useage-01.txt, Seth Breidbart, 04/10/2005
Re: Broken Mesage-ID syntax (was: Issues outstanding), Charles Lindsey, 04/10/2005
Re: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-useage-01.txt, Charles Lindsey, 04/10/2005
Broken Mesage-ID syntax (was: Issues outstanding), Frank Ellermann, 04/10/2005
Path header delimiters, Charles Lindsey, 04/09/2005
Differences between RFC 2822 and Usefor, Charles Lindsey, 04/09/2005
Re: Babble from Frank Ellermann <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Charles Lindsey, 04/09/2005
Re: =?utf-8*de-de-1996?b?RG9uYXVkYW1wZnNjaGlmZmZhaHJ0c2thcGl0w6Ruc23DvHR6ZQ==?=, Frank Ellermann, 04/08/2005
=?utf-8*de-de-1996?b?RG9uYXVkYW1wZnNjaGlmZmZhaHJ0c2thcGl0w6Ruc23DvHR6ZQ==?=, Frank Ellermann, 04/08/2005
Re: Issues outstanding, Charles Lindsey, 04/08/2005
Re: =?utf-8*de-de-?b?RG9uYXVkYW1wZnNjaGlmZmZhaHJ0c2thcGl0w6Ruc23DvHR6ZQ==?=, Charles Lindsey, 04/08/2005
=?utf-8*de-de-1996?b?RG9uYXVkYW1wZnNjaGlmZmZhaHJ0c2thcGl0w6Ruc23DvHR6ZQ==?=, Frank Ellermann, 04/07/2005
Re: Issues outstanding, Alexey Melnikov, 04/07/2005
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-03.txt, Internet-Drafts, 04/06/2005
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-useage-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, 03/16/2005
Re: User-Agent = an outstanding issue, Charles Lindsey, 02/25/2005
Re: mdomain vs. id-right again, Frank Ellermann, 02/25/2005
Re: User-Agent = an outstanding issue, Bruce Lilly, 02/24/2005
Re: User-Agent = an outstanding issue, ned . freed, 02/24/2005
Re: User-Agent = an outstanding issue, Charles Lindsey, 02/24/2005
Re: mdomain vs. id-right again, Charles Lindsey, 02/24/2005
Re: mdomain vs. id-right again, Frank Ellermann, 02/23/2005
Re: To do, Frank Ellermann, 02/23/2005
Re: User-Agent = an outstanding issue, Henry Spencer, 02/23/2005
User-Agent = an outstanding issue, Bruce Lilly, 02/23/2005

Page 8 of 9
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.