Re: Issues outstanding

[Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov-usefor@xxxxxxxxx>]

Charles Lindsey wrote:

> We are coming to the point where there is little more that can be done on
> the documents we are supposed to be producing without deciding how various
> outstanding issues are to be resolved.
>
> [...]
>
> 3. Mail-Copies-To and Posted-And Mailed
>
> Available options appear to be:
>
> 1.  Include them as in draft-13
> 2a. Defer them to a future document (standards-track)
> 2b. Defer them to a future document (experimental)
> 3.  Drop them entirely
>
> Earlier discussions were inconclusive. I gather our Chair prefers #2 (a or
> b), but he has made no definitive pronouncement.
>  
The WG has enough things to do already, so we should do 2) or even 3).

> 4.  Terminology for followups.
>
> [...] 
And based on recent discussions I am adding to this list:

5. Review Injection-Info syntax (this might be related to Complaints-To)

6. Remove filename parameter from the Archive header.

7. FWS issue in headers.

Any other major issues for the USEFOR document that I've missed?

Alexey