Re: Is this a STraw Poll?

[Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov-usefor@xxxxxxxxx>]

Charles Lindsey wrote:

> In <41C9AE8D.5070809@xxxxxxxxx> Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov-usefor@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>  
>
> > Charles Lindsey wrote:
> >    
> >
> > > In <87wtvbsh4c.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Russ Allbery <rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >      
> > >
> > > > Charles Lindsey <chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > >        
> > > >
> > > > > Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov-usefor@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > > >          
> > > > >
> > > > > > This WG has enough work to do already, so I am Ok with defining
> > > > > > complaints-url in a separate document. However the syntax for
> > > > > > Injection-Info (or whatever we end up using) should allow for multiple
> > > > > > URLs.
> > > > > >       
> > > > > >            
> > > > >  mail-complaints-param = "mail-complaints-to" "=" address-list
> > > > >          
> > My question is: do we *want* to allow for multiple complaints-to email 
> > addresses?
> >    
>
> The syntax I gave already allows for multiple complaints-to email
> addresses, because it contains an address-list (the Complaints-To header
> likewise). OK, we have to make it clear that it means "send your complaint
> to one of these addresses", and not "send it to all of them", and that is
> indeed not quite the usual interpretation of <address-list>. So first, let
> us be clear which of those interpretations you have in mind, and then we
> can ask whether <address-list> is the proper syntax to do it.
>  
I think that only "send to one of those addresses" interpretation makes 
sense.
However, I can't even see a practical need for multiple addresses. Can 
somebody give an example?

> If a future document introduces a complaints-url (whatever) parameter, as
> you have suggested, then it will be up to that document to make provision
> for multiple URLs.
>  
Of course.