[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: =?utf-8*de-de-1996?b?RG9uYXVkYW1wZnNjaGlmZmZhaHJ0c2thcGl0w6Ruc23DvHR6ZQ==?=

To: ietf-usefor@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: =?utf-8*de-de-1996?b?RG9uYXVkYW1wZnNjaGlmZmZhaHJ0c2thcGl0w6Ruc23DvHR6ZQ==?=
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 06:55:19 +0200
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-usefor/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-usefor.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-usefor-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
References: <> <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@xxxxxxxxxxxx

I've just tested it with two news servers, and both rejected a
"Subject:" SP CRLF SP "stuff" CRLF

So "fixing" the FWS issue by removing the separate MUST about
non-empty header body lines Usefor-03 would be a very bad idea.

Maybe I should a post an I-D "Subject: Re: considered effective
at least" mentioning this case.

References:
- Issues outstanding
  - From: Charles Lindsey
- Re: Issues outstanding
  - From: Alexey Melnikov
- =?utf-8*de-de-1996?b?RG9uYXVkYW1wZnNjaGlmZmZhaHJ0c2thcGl0w6Ruc23DvHR6ZQ==?=
  - From: Frank Ellermann
- Re: =?utf-8*de-de-?b?RG9uYXVkYW1wZnNjaGlmZmZhaHJ0c2thcGl0w6Ruc23DvHR6ZQ==?=
  - From: Charles Lindsey
- =?utf-8*de-de-1996?b?RG9uYXVkYW1wZnNjaGlmZmZhaHJ0c2thcGl0w6Ruc23DvHR6ZQ==?=
  - From: Frank Ellermann

Prev by Date: =?utf-8*de-de-1996?b?RG9uYXVkYW1wZnNjaGlmZmZhaHJ0c2thcGl0w6Ruc23DvHR6ZQ==?=
Previous by thread: =?utf-8*de-de-1996?b?RG9uYXVkYW1wZnNjaGlmZmZhaHJ0c2thcGl0w6Ruc23DvHR6ZQ==?=
Next by thread: Re: Issues outstanding
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread