[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: #1047 Path-identity: A proposal (perhaps)

To: ietf-usefor@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: #1047 Path-identity: A proposal (perhaps)
From: Russ Allbery <rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:41:06 -0700
In-reply-to: <> (Harald Tveit Alvestrand's message of "Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:33:30 +0200")
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-usefor/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-usefor.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-usefor-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: The Eyrie
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux)

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> At the moment, it seems that we're at an impasse partially caused by our
> documents' failure to explain what a "path-identity" is. I don't know if
> I understand it either....

> At the moment, the specific format and use of path-identity is punted to
> USEPRO, where it seems to be still undefined.

> If we explained it, would this be a reasonable text to insert in 3.1.6?
> (I've modified the BNF too. Only modified stuff included here)

This looks okay to me.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

References:
- #1047 Path-identity: A proposal (perhaps)
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Prev by Date: Re: NEW: Path field delimiters and components; also #1003 USEFOR 3.1.3 - Resolution of msg-id issues
Next by Date: Re: #1047 Path field delimiters - feed behaviour? (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: #1047 Path-identity: A proposal (perhaps)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread