[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: #1053 USEFOR 2.1 Relationship to RFC 2822 (NEW: blanket statements vs. the law of unintended consequences, also Re: #1028 USEFOR 3.1.2 Date: Resolved, I think.






--On fredag, juli 01, 2005 08:41:14 -0400 Bruce Lilly <blilly@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


No, I said:
  I propose eliminating the blanket
  statement in section 2.1 (i.e. the second sentence of the first
paragraph),   with the understanding that that does not preclude adding
limited-scope   relaxation of specific parts of 2822 obs-syntax parsing
requirements   where appropriate and where justifiable.

What you quoted was background information, not a proposal.  The hint
is the words, "I propose", which was perhaps too subtle; I apologize
for any confusion such subtlety might have caused.

I copied your whole message into the ticket. I was commenting on your "background information", which, to me, seems to state the issue you want solved rather than how to solve it, which is why I chose to quote that.