Re: #1047 Path-identity: A proposal (perhaps)

["Charles Lindsey" <chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In <42C467D8.72C5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Frank Ellermann <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:


So I have s/SHOULD/should/. I tried other wordings, but that seemed to fit
best.

>>| The FQDN of a news-server is "mailable" if its
>>| administrators can be reached by email using both of the
>>| forms "usenet@<FQDN>" and "news@<FQDN>", in conformity
>>| with [RFC 2142].

>Maybe say 'forms "usenet@" and "news@" at the FQDN represented
>by the <path-identity>, in conformity with [RFC 2142].'  Issue:
>I'm not sure about using <FQDN> if that's no term in the ABNF.

OK, I have done that:

   The FQDN of a news-server is "mailable" if its administrators can be
   reached by email using both of the forms "usenet@" and "news@"
   followed by that FQDN, in conformity with [RFC 2142].


>Some of Bruce's points are not yet covered, MISMATCH!MISMATCH
>etc., maybe we have to declare these beasts as special cases
>of a path-delimiter, brain-storming:

See my reply to Bruce. USEPRO gives clear instructions how to construct
them, and that is probably enough.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5