Re: #1029: USEFOR 3.2.2 References: Should comments be a MUST NOT? (fwd)

["Ruud H.G. van Tol" <rvtol@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Charles Lindsey:
> Forrest J. Cavalier III:

>> 5. Agents MAY remove comments from References.
>
> [...]
> There is a limited provision for injecting agents to "mend" things
> that are incomplete [...]

Incomplete in the sense of 'unfinished'. :)


> I don't really think this one is a good candidate even for that,
> though.

Of course such header fields MUST NOT change in 'public' transit. 
A followup-agent "MAY replace CFWS by FWS" (as Frank says).

-- 
Grtz, Ruud