[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: #1003 Message-ID text: Resolving

To: ietf-usefor@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: #1003 Message-ID text: Resolving
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 06:03:24 +0200
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-usefor/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-usefor.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-usefor-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
References: <> <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Charles Lindsey wrote:

> I think those items are more USEPRO or UESEAGE.

The RHS semantics is reflected in the syntax of 1036 and 1738:

1036: <unique@full_domain_name>

1738: 1*[ uchar | ";" | "/" | "?" | ":" | "&" | "=" ] "@" host

The RHS semantics is reflected in my msg-id.txt and news-uri:

| msg-id       =  "<" id-local "@" id-domain ">"

| message-id   = unique "@" host                ; see RFC 1036

The name <id-right> is a severe security violation.  Bye, Frank

Follow-Ups:
- Re: #1003 Message-ID text: Resolving
  - From: Charles Lindsey

References:
- #1003 Message-ID text: Resolving
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1003 Message-ID text: Resolving
  - From: Forrest J. Cavalier III
- Re: #1003 Message-ID text: Resolving
  - From: Charles Lindsey

Prev by Date: Re: required SP
Next by Date: Re: #1003 USEFOR 3.1.3 msg-id issues - attempt to focus
Previous by thread: Re: #1003 Message-ID text: Resolving
Next by thread: Re: #1003 Message-ID text: Resolving
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread