Re: New USEPRO path-identity text

["Charles Lindsey" <chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In <Pine.LNX.4.53.0507211353440.12427@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> John Stanley <stanley@xxxxxxxx> writes:

>Your MUST regarding an abuse@ address at every FQDN that appears in a path
>is for NEWS, and we already require not just one but TWO addresses for
>news administrators to deal with news configuration problems. 
>Interoperability issues for NEWS are solved by using the USENET@ and 
>NEWS@ addresses (although I cannot see why two are required when one 
>would do.) 

Sigh!

I have NEVER EVER proposed any "MUST regarding an abuse@ address at every
FQDN that appears in a path".

If you cannot even take the trouble to read what is in front of you, then
there is little point in continuing this discussion. This WG has more
important things to do that arguing over your strawmen.

May I suggest that you read USEPRO-04, and then come back here with such
problems as you may have with what is proposed there.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5