[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New USEPRO path-identity text
In <Pine.LNX.4.53.0507250751450.27209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> John Stanley <stanley@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>"Charles Lindsey" <chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>I have NEVER EVER proposed any "MUST regarding an abuse@ address at every
>>FQDN that appears in a path".
>Here is the text that is unacceptable, and that you have repeatedly been
>unwilling the mandate contained therein:
> For an injecting agent prepending to a Path header field (7.2.2), the
> <path-identity> MUST be option 1 or 3 and the FQDN MUST be mailable,
> and if the agent offers its services to the general public the form
> "abuse@" that FQDN MUST also be available, unless a more specific
> complaints address has been provided in a <complainto-param> of an
> Injection-Info header field (F-3.2.14).
>Yes, it does not say "every FQDN", but you know what text is being
>discussed because I have quoted it to you many times already, INCLUDING an
>acceptable alternative.
Thank you for confirming that I had not said what you had alleged I had said.
No, if you have a problem, please describe it in terms of what is actually
being proposed.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5