[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status






--On mandag, august 22, 2005 11:58:32 +0000 Charles Lindsey <chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Saying that giving a name to your system is REQUIRED by the standards is
a  Good Thing, and allows us to positively refuse to allow such idiocies
as  using an IP address to identify your server in injection-info.

Why is it an "idiocy"? We are talking about globally routable IP addresses which are allocated according to a very well defined procedure. So, in fact, they would actually be safer than "barewords".

RFC 1958 section 4.1:


  4.1 Avoid any design that requires addresses to be hard coded or
  stored on non-volatile storage (except of course where this is an
  essential requirement as in a name server or configuration server).
  In general, user applications should use names rather than addresses.

That's been an Internet architectural principle for 10 years, and we have LOTS of experience in what happens when you violate that principle.
I stand by "idiocy".


Harald