Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status

[kaih@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Kai Henningsen)]

richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Clayton)  wrote on 02.09.05 in <kmEa$Sek8HGDFAAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> In message <9d4SRcXXw-B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kai Henningsen
> <kaih@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
> >
> >richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Clayton)  wrote on 21.08.05 in
> ><jr6LcRfMrKCDFARx @highwayman.com>:
> >
> >> The algorithm was to start from 'news.maxwell.syr.edu' and see if any
> >> article arrived that had been given any articles by this machine. If so
> >> then they were added to the core and a check made to see if there were
> >> now other machines to which articles had been given...  iterate.
> >
> >To get an impression of how fully you saw the periphery of the net, can
> >you tell me how many (or which) westfalen.de machines you found?
>
> core path identities (I've no idea what a "machine" is)
>
>         colo.khms.westfalen.de
>         silvana.westfalen.de
>         westfalen.de
>
> other path identities that sent messages to machines in the core
>
>         dl6dx.westfalen.de
>         ripley.westfalen.de
>         news.khms.westfalen.de
>
> recall that this was July->October 2004

Those are in fact all different machines :-) (khms.westfalen.de would be  
the same as news.khms.westfalen.de, but you don't list it.)

I wouldn't have expected to see any of those in "core" ... on the other  
hand, I'd have expected to see khms.westfalen.de in the lower group; I  
certainly posted quite some articles during that time!

MfG Kai