YES - IP addresses should be allowed as path-identity. NO - IP addresses should not be allowed as path-identity.
My currently proposed USEPRO text is:
<Path-identity>s can take the following forms (in decreasing order of preference):
1. A fully qualified domain name (FQDN) associated with an "A" or "AAAA" record identifying that news-server, or with an "MX" record through which its administrators can be contacted; alternatively an equivalent "CNAME".
2. An encoding of the public [RFC 1918], permanently routable IP address - <IPv4address> or <IPv6address> [RFC 3986] - of that news-server. This option SHOULD NOT be used if an FQDN for that server is available (however, such IP addresses are perfectly suitable for purely diagnostic identities [reference needed to later section]).
3. Some other (arbitrary) name believed to be unique and registered at least with all other news-servers sending articles directly to the given one. This option SHOULD NOT be used unless the earlier options are unavailable (e.g. because the server in question is not connected to the Internet), or unless it is of longstanding usage and cessation would be unduly disruptive, or unless one of the earlier options is provided as well.
Attachment:
pgp00004.pgp
Description: PGP signature