[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

ADMIN: Final warning to John Stanley




John,


I do not find you amusing.
Or constructive.

I will suspend your posting rights to this list the next time you post something that I find equally non-constructive.

See RFC 3934 for the details.

--On mandag, september 12, 2005 10:51:31 -0700 John Stanley <stanley@xxxxxxxx> wrote:



Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

... given that your previous case 2 should disappear,

Given? The only given about case 2 is that it will continue to happen. When did it become a "given" that it should dissappear? The poll result was 4 to 2 (hardly earthshaking), and the 4 were actually voting that ip literals still be allowed to appear in the path header field but they just won't be called path-identities.

It looks like a duck, it walks like a duck, it appears in the same place
a  duck appears, but it ain't a duck because we think it is "given" that
it ain't a duck. Green is red.