[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result






--On onsdag, september 14, 2005 12:00:53 +0000 Charles Lindsey <chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


With that version of <label> there's still an unnecessary
ambiguity with <IPv4address>, it can be solved by <toplabel>:

No, there is no need for that. Every <label> has to begin with ALPHA (and that was in RFC 1035), so if you see anything with just digits and "."s in it, it is either an <IPv4address> or it is a syntax error.

3com killed that piece of RFC 1035 many years ago. These days, 121.net is a valid domain (belonging to a Hong Kong company).

Sorry, reality intruded.