[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pseudo-TLDs
In <433157C7.3CDA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Frank Ellermann <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>Charles Lindsey wrote:
>> Unfortunately, ICANN never signed up to RFC 2606
>I'd guess that there was an "IETF last call" for this BCP,
I don't think the IETF procedures were quite as rigorous in those days -
and a BCP is not in itself mandatory.
>But actually I think they have no problems with RfC 2606,
>IANA hosted the (dummy) <http://example.org> etc. pages
>for the three example SLDs defined in RfC 2606 chapter 3.
Yes, but they never hosted or reserved example (etc) as a TLD (which
technically could have been done in the same way as those three).
And all of invalid.[org,com,net] are already taken (and not by IANA).
>A Google search "2606 site:icann.org" resulted in 25 hits,
>some indicate that ICANN does know and support this BCP,
>e.g. <http://www.icann.org/tlds/tld-criteria-15aug00.htm>
Right! I did not spot that one on my previous searches through IANA. I am
much happier now.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5