Re: pseudo-TLDs

["Forrest J. Cavalier III" <forrest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Frank Ellermann wrote:

> Some folks want a TLD ".berlin", and from there to ".seen"
> (= de for ".seas") would be only a small step.  Forrest's
> ideas, keywords before diag and / or "impossible" keywords
> starting with a dot (or maybe underscore) could guarantee
> to avoid potential conflicts.

I think prefix dot is much better than underscore.  Many
internationalization overloads have been proposed using a prefix 
underscore in the past.

Why use up that option and force future innovators into a corner for 
no good reason?