[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: #1417: USEPRO 3.4: Injecting-agent modification of message-ID

To: ietf-usefor@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: #1417: USEPRO 3.4: Injecting-agent modification of message-ID
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:52:56 +0100
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-usefor/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-usefor.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-usefor-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
References: <871wlr7ifs.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Russ Allbery wrote:

> I'd prefer that discussion about changing the general SHOULD NOT about
> all header fields to a MUST NOT be a separate discussion, since the 
> Message-ID has a distinguished protocol status and an interoperability
> use case that the other header fields don't have.

ACK, but is there any controversy about your proposal limited to the
Message-ID ?  IFF not I'd say "make it so".

Frank

References:
- #1417: USEPRO 3.4: Injecting-agent modification of message-ID
  - From: Russ Allbery

Prev by Date: #1416: USEPRO 3.9: Reinjection and Injection-Date (was: Re: Injection-Date and reinjection)
Next by Date: Re: Injection-Date and reinjection
Previous by thread: #1417: USEPRO 3.4: Injecting-agent modification of message-ID
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread