Re: #1093

[Russ Allbery <rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Frank Ellermann <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> postmaster@, webmaster@, and abuse@ are among the local parts I consider
> as "potentially valid", therefore it won't directly go to a junk folder.

> The spam to these addresses is very rare, I don't recall a single case
> of postmaster@ in the last 500,000 mails.  For webmaster@ it's not so
> good, but a smart harvester could find this address if it follows the
> <meta rev="made" href="http://putl.net/xyzzy/mailto/webmaster"; /> links
> on my pages, and if it also knows the %40 trick.

Lucky you.

I'm postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxx as well as postmaster at quite a few other
systems here, and I can assure you that from where I'm sitting, you look
like an exception.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>