[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Injection-Date and reinjection




Charles Lindsey wrote:
In <45B0DA9F.9060003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "Forrest J. Cavalier III" <mibsoft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:


Russ Allbery wrote:


We need to say *what* other header fields it will rename.  I think we also
have to allow for drop as well as rename; for example, if I'm posting to a
disconnected INN server and then gatewaying those articles to Usenet, my
local trace information is entirely irrelevant and there's no reason to
retain it.


Isn't that permitted by the last SHOULD?  Why is the trace information
entirely irrelevant?  It isn't any more irrelevant than opaque trace
information from all the other servers.


Yes, my preference is to preserve all the Path header, even early parts of
it that recorded its progress through some private system before getting
injected into Usenet. It will do litle harm, and may help unravel some
complicated cases where things have gone wrong. That is why Usepro-06 said
SHOULD preserve the old Path during reinjection. Then you get to see the
full story of exactly where it has been.


You are comingling two points of argument, I think.  I do not consider
the Path header as trace information.

I don't see any way to preserve Path except by renaming before reinjection. Reinjection is a POST through an injecting agent, after all.

Either injecting agents are responsible for adding trustable headers to the proto articles (after removing any that are present) or they are not.

That question is already answered: we live with what existing injecting agents do.