[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: #1416 Injection-Date: current wording proposal (corrected)



In <87r6p8x140.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Russ Allbery <rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>This header has been around for years.  Has this ever happened?  If it
>has, I have no objections to mentioning it in Security Considerations, but
>if it hasn't, it seems like wasted verbiage to me.

Not that I know of. But the inventors of that header wisely included a
SHOULD NOT use it in News, and we should either invoke that by reference,
or specify it explicitly. And it is a good idea for injecting agents to
check for its absence, and for sure it needs a mention in the Security
Considerations.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5