Re: History section (Re: #1416 Injection-Date: proposed diff)

[Russ Allbery <rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Harald Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Speaking as a contributor:
> I like the text of the history section, and think that we should just
> declare it "text accepted".

That would make my life much easier.  I'd like us to just do that as
well.

>>          an injecting agent.  Normally this action is done once and only
>> -        once for a given article.  "Reinjecting" an article is passing an
>> -        already-injected article to an injection agent.</t>
>> +        once for a given article.  "Multiple injection" is passing the
>> +        same article to multiple injecting agents, either serially or in
>> +        parallel.</t>

> Nit: this doesn't seem to take a position on whether it's the same
> posting agent doing the multiple injection or different posting agents;
> I suggest adding ", by one or several posting agents" if this is what we
> think is intended.

That's the intention here.  I've changed my text accordingly.

>> +        encouraged to use one of them, especially if they not have

> nit: "not have" - > "do not have".

Fixed in my draft.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>