Re: RFC2822bis, Message-IDs and USEFOR

["Charles Lindsey" <chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In <47E164DD.4030206@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>Unless somehow a horde of people with lots of energy and competence 
>appears on the mailing list, I'm not going to entertain proposals for 
>reopening USEFOR.

I am happy to propose the detailed changes that would be needed, if we
decide to go that route.

>Just finding the energy to call the question on the last outstanding 
>USEPRO question is proving too much for these chairs.

Which is the REAL problem facing this WG. USEPRO is stymied until that
issue is resolved. We have had the dicussion. We have an agreed summary of
the pros and cons of the two options. I have three times asked (twice on
this list and once by private email) for a head count to see whether we
can achieve a consensus on one of them.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5