[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: #1416



In <5A18B4E3-856D-407D-95EB-BCB7A78EADC8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>On Aug 7, 2008, at 4:14 PM, stanley@xxxxxxxx wrote:


>The WG came to consensus around most of the latest I-D with the  
>exception of issue #1416, and partial consensus is not the same as no  
>consensus when we look at the whole document.  Recall that even if an  
>incomplete revision is made RFC, it can itself be replaced by another  
>RFC.  Perfection is never attainable, mere improvement is often  
>helpful, and the process is iterative.

I think you need the various changes that Russ has recently put before us,
including the resolution to #1416. I.e., it is better with that text in
whether the sentence that I want removed is removed or not, though
obviously I prefer it with the sentence removed.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5