[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: ISSUE: Checkgroups control messages

To: ietf-usefor@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Fwd: ISSUE: Checkgroups control messages
From: Russ Allbery <rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:11:56 -0700
In-reply-to: <K7AnDH.1oA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Charles Lindsey's message of "Tue\, 16 Sep 2008 15\:08\:05 GMT")
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-usefor/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-usefor.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-usefor-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: The Eyrie
References: <87prnd87k9.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <K7AnDH.1oA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-usefor@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)

"Charles Lindsey" <chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Russ Allbery <rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> There is also "and should not be honored" where "SHOULD" should be used,
>> shouldn't it?

> +1

Examples intentionally don't use RFC 2119 language because they're not
normative.  (The constraint is already stated elsewhere with SHOULD.)

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fwd: ISSUE: Checkgroups control messages
  - From: Charles Lindsey

References:
- Fwd: ISSUE: Checkgroups control messages
  - From: Russ Allbery
- Re: Fwd: ISSUE: Checkgroups control messages
  - From: Charles Lindsey

Prev by Date: Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-12
Next by Date: Re: Fwd: ISSUE: Checkgroups control messages
Previous by thread: Re: Fwd: ISSUE: Checkgroups control messages
Next by thread: Re: Fwd: ISSUE: Checkgroups control messages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread