[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Niggles in usepro-draft-11
In <8BCC8FD2-6FEB-44E2-A904-5E88E94F5EFE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thorfinn <thorfinn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>On 26 Sep 2008, at 05:06, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> "The same" to me includes the possibility of "none."
>"the same checks" does definitely have a small difference in
>implication to "whatever checks". "the same checks" has a slightly
>stronger implication that there is at least one check. It's not a
>hugely stronger implication, no. And it is just in implication,
>rather than in explicit meaning.
Yes, that is essentially the point I was trying to make. Or Julien's "if
any" would do as well.
>However, I think that that is not a bad implication to have, and you
>are certainly correct that "the same" includes the possibility of
Indeed, but if you want to drop more/stronger hints that checks on cancel
messages are a Good Thing, then the text(s) discussing cancel messages is
the place to do it (but we already say as much as we reasonably can
>Certainly implementors of news software (the target audience for this)
>should already understand that possibility. :-)
Implementors "should" do lots of things :-( .
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5