Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5537 (1980)

[=?utf-8?q?Julien_=C3=89LIE?= <julien@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Russ,

Maybe I should re-ask, before the verification takes place...
Didn't the mails I sent for errata 1979, 1980 and 1982 reach you?


> Given this, I agree with all the changes you propose and think the errata
> should be verified in its entirety.

If the erratum is to be verified, be sure to also include the fourth paragraph
of Section 3.4.  It should also be amended:

   predating this specification do not add an Injection-Date header.

"field" is missing.


Another thing:  why is it "header field value" and not "header field body"?
RFCs 5322 and 5536 define "header field body" but not "header field value".
Where is the terminology drawn?

--
Julien ÉLIE

« Plus un ordinateur possède de RAM, plus vite il peut générer
 un message d'erreur. »