[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Syntax validation of articles by injecting agents



In <7Ey9XHElGzQLFAQU@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Richard Clayton <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>In message <KvrvuC.F57@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Charles Lindsey
><chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes

>>But I don't think RFC 2049 ever intended to imply that MIME-Version was
>>needed for a message that did not actually use any of the MIME features.

>Hardly on topic for this list, but yes that's exactly what it means, and
>what it was intended to mean.  It's no big deal for a client to generate
>the header field, so it's hardly onerous!  (see this message for an
>example of a compliant client)

Then how do you account for the option of not including in in RFC 2047?

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131            Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5