[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Syntax validation of articles by injecting agents
In <7Ey9XHElGzQLFAQU@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Richard Clayton <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>In message <KvrvuC.F57@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Charles Lindsey
><chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
>>But I don't think RFC 2049 ever intended to imply that MIME-Version was
>>needed for a message that did not actually use any of the MIME features.
>Hardly on topic for this list, but yes that's exactly what it means, and
>what it was intended to mean. It's no big deal for a client to generate
>the header field, so it's hardly onerous! (see this message for an
>example of a compliant client)
Then how do you account for the option of not including in in RFC 2047?
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5