Archive of ietf-usefor, by thread

Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-usefor

Page 6 of 10
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, (continued)
- Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, Charles Lindsey
  - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, Charles Lindsey
    - Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites (Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites (Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status), Richard Clayton
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites (Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status), Russ Allbery
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites (Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status), Forrest J. Cavalier III
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites (Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites (Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status), Forrest J. Cavalier III
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites, Forrest J. Cavalier III
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites (Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites (Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites (Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status), Forrest J. Cavalier III
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites (Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites (Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status), Seth Breidbart
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites (Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status), Dan Schlitt
    - Re: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites (Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status), Charles Lindsey
    - #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Bill McQuillan
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Charles Lindsey
    - pseudo-TLDs (was: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result), Frank Ellermann
    - Re: pseudo-TLDs, Forrest J. Cavalier III
    - Re: pseudo-TLDs, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: pseudo-TLDs (was: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: pseudo-TLDs, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: pseudo-TLDs, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: pseudo-TLDs, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: pseudo-TLDs, Forrest J. Cavalier III
    - Re: pseudo-TLDs, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: pseudo-TLDs, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Charles Lindsey
    - Yet another Path ABNF (was: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result), Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Yet another Path ABNF (was: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: Yet another Path ABNF, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Charles Lindsey
    - Simplified path ABNF / tail-entry trouble #1132 (was: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result), Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Russ Allbery
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Russ Allbery
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1132: Allowing IP addresses as path-identiites - Poll result, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, Kai Henningsen
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, Charles Lindsey
    - NAI semantics (Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: NAI semantics, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: NAI semantics (Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, Kai Henningsen
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, Charles Lindsey
- #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, John Stanley
- Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, John Stanley
  - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, Charles Lindsey
- Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, John Stanley
- Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and syntax - status, John Stanley
  - ADMIN: Final warning to John Stanley, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
#1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Henry Spencer
  - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Henry Spencer
    - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Frank Ellermann
- Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Bruce Lilly
  - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Charles Lindsey
  - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Russ Allbery
- Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Charles Lindsey
  - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Charles Lindsey
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, John Stanley
  - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  - Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, John Stanley
- Re: #1053 Relationship to RFC 2822 - suggestion, John Stanley
Archives: Text version seems available and up-to-date, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
#1093 Email addresses - Consensus, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Angels, pins, 2142 and 2119, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Angels, pins, 2142 and 2119, John Stanley
Next steps - please concentrate on USEFOR again, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Next steps - please concentrate on USEFOR again, Charles Lindsey
  - Re: Next steps - please concentrate on USEFOR again, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - #1101 empty body (was: Next steps - please concentrate on USEFOR again), Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1101 empty body (was: Next steps - please concentrate on USEFOR again), Charles Lindsey
  - Re: Next steps - please concentrate on USEFOR again, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: Next steps - please concentrate on USEFOR again, Charles Lindsey
#1093 Email addresses - conclusion, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, Frank Ellermann
- Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, Charles Lindsey
  - Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, Forrest J. Cavalier III
    - Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, Henry Spencer
    - Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, Forrest J. Cavalier III
    - Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, Charles Lindsey
  - Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, Charles Lindsey
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, John Stanley
  - Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, John Stanley
    - Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, Richard Clayton
- Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, John Stanley
  - Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, John Stanley
- Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, John Stanley
- Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, John Stanley
  - Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, Steve Walker
  - Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, John Stanley
  - Re: #1093 Email addresses - conclusion, Charles Lindsey
#1093 Email addresses: Poll results, sort of final, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll results, sort of final, Bruce Lilly
  - English (Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll results, sort of final), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
#1093 Email addresses: Poll results, so far, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll results, so far, Charles Lindsey
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: #1093 Email addresses: Poll results, so far, John Stanley
  - RE: #1093 Email addresses: Poll results, so far, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  - Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll results, so far, Charles Lindsey
- Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll results, so far, John Stanley
Re: Shame vs Engineering, also NEW conformance criteria, John Stanley
- Re: Shame vs Engineering, Bruce Lilly
- Re: Shame vs Engineering, also NEW conformance criteria, Charles Lindsey
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Shame vs Engineering, also NEW conformance criteria, John Stanley
  - Re: Shame vs Engineering, also NEW conformance criteria, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  - Re: Shame vs Engineering, also NEW conformance criteria, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: Shame vs Engineering, also NEW conformance criteria, Richard Clayton
    - Re: Shame vs Engineering, also NEW conformance criteria, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: Shame vs Engineering, also NEW conformance criteria, Charles Lindsey
- Re: Shame vs Engineering, also NEW conformance criteria, John Stanley
#1093 USEPRO 2.3: Supported email addresses, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
#1093 Email addresses: Poll, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll, Richard Clayton
- Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll, Russ Allbery
- Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll, Frank Ellermann
- Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll, Bruce Lilly
- Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll, Forrest J. Cavalier III
  - Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll, Charles Lindsey
- Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll, Ralph Babel, singing - so be afraid
  - Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll, Dan Schlitt
- Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll, Eivind Tagseth
- <Possible follow-ups>
- #1093 Email addresses: Poll, John Stanley
- Re: #1093 Email addresses: Poll, John Stanley
I'm back.... sorry about the absence, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Shame vs Engineering, John Stanley
- Re: Shame vs Engineering, also NEW conformance criteria, Bruce Lilly
  - Re: Shame vs Engineering, also NEW conformance criteria, Charles Lindsey
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Shame vs Engineering, John Stanley
  - Re: Shame vs Engineering, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: Shame vs Engineering, Forrest J. Cavalier III
    - Re: Shame vs Engineering, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: Shame vs Engineering, Charles Lindsey
- Re: Shame vs Engineering, John Stanley
- Re: Shame vs Engineering, John Stanley
  - Re: Shame vs Engineering, Richard Clayton
- Re: Shame vs Engineering, John Stanley
  - Re: Shame vs Engineering, Richard Clayton
- Re: Shame vs Engineering, John Stanley
Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info, John Stanley
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info, John Stanley
  - ADMIN: Please refrain from the insults (Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), John Stanley
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Charles Lindsey
  - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Richard Clayton
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Bruce Lilly
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Richard Clayton
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Bruce Lilly
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Frank Ellermann
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Frank Ellermann
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Richard Clayton
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Bruce Lilly
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Forrest J. Cavalier III
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Forrest J. Cavalier III
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Forrest J. Cavalier III
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Frank Ellermann
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Russ Allbery
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Frank Ellermann
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Russ Allbery
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Richard Clayton
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Charles Lindsey
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), John Stanley
  - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Charles Lindsey
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), John Stanley
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), John Stanley
  - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Charles Lindsey
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), John Stanley
  - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Forrest J. Cavalier III
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), John Stanley
  - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text (Hello, Chair?), Charles Lindsey
Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Charles Lindsey
- Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Bruce Lilly
  - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1080 - MIME parameters for Injection-Info and Archive header field need more text/updated syntax, Charles Lindsey
#1021 Newsgroups header ABNF: Status, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1021 Newsgroups header ABNF: Status, Russ Allbery
  - Re: #1021 Newsgroups header ABNF: Status, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: #1082 USEFOR 3.2.9 Need more text about Approved header field seman, Charles Lindsey
- Re: #1082 USEFOR 3.2.9 Need more text about Approved header field seman, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: #1082 USEFOR 3.2.9 Need more text about Approved header field seman, Charles Lindsey
- Re: #1082 USEFOR 3.2.9 Need more text about Approved header field seman, Alexey Melnikov
  - Re: #1082 USEFOR 3.2.9 Need more text about Approved header field seman, Charles Lindsey
#1032 USEFOR changes from 1036, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1032 USEFOR changes from 1036, Henry Spencer
- Re: #1032 USEFOR changes from 1036, Frank Ellermann
- Re: #1032 USEFOR changes from 1036, Charles Lindsey
  - Re: #1032 USEFOR changes from 1036, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: #1032 USEFOR changes from 1036, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1032 USEFOR changes from 1036, Charles Lindsey
- Re: #1032 USEFOR changes from 1036, Bruce Lilly
#1003 Message-ID issues - status, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1003 Message-ID issues - status, Charles Lindsey
- Re: #1003 Message-ID issues - status, Bruce Lilly
  - Re: #1003 Message-ID issues - status, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1003 Message-ID issues - status, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: #1003 Message-ID issues - status, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: #1003 Message-ID issues - status, Charles Lindsey
#1030 and #1031, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1030 and #1031, Forrest J. Cavalier III
  - Re: #1030 and #1031, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
#1084 USEFOR 2.1, 3: Names for ABNF productions redefining 822 constructs, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1084 USEFOR 2.1, 3: Names for ABNF productions redefining 822 , constructs, Henry Spencer
- Re: #1084 USEFOR 2.1, 3: Names for ABNF productions redefining 822 constructs, Charles Lindsey
  - Re: #1084 USEFOR 2.1, 3: Names for ABNF productions redefining 822 constructs, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: #1084 USEFOR 2.1, 3: Names for ABNF productions redefining 822 constructs, Frank Ellermann
- Re: #1084 USEFOR 2.1, 3: Names for ABNF productions redefining 822 constructs, Russ Allbery
Re: #1083 USEPRO 7.5: Rules for Generating message-ID, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: #1083 USEPRO 7.5: Rules for Generating message-ID, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: #1083 USEPRO 7.5: Rules for Generating message-ID, Forrest J. Cavalier III
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: #1083 USEPRO 7.5: Rules for Generating message-ID, John Stanley
  - Re: #1083 USEPRO 7.5: Rules for Generating message-ID, Charles Lindsey
- Re: #1083 USEPRO 7.5: Rules for Generating message-ID, John Stanley
NEW: USEFOR -05 3.1 Injection-Date was mandatory, Charles Lindsey
- Re: NEW: USEFOR -05 3.1 Injection-Date was mandatory, Frank Ellermann
- Re: NEW: USEFOR -05 3.1 Injection-Date was mandatory, Alexey Melnikov
NEW: USEFOR 05 3.2.14 Injection-Info, Charles Lindsey
About relationship to other standards - 2142 in particular, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Ticket status, USEFOR, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- #1046 MIME boundary issues (was: Ticket status, USEFOR), Frank Ellermann
- #1028 orig-date (was: Ticket status, USEFOR), Frank Ellermann
  - Re: #1028 orig-date (was: Ticket status, USEFOR), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- #1040 e.a. (was: Ticket status, USEFOR), Frank Ellermann
  - Re: #1048 e.a. (was: #1040 e.a), Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1048 e.a. (was: #1040 e.a), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: #1048 e.a., Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1048 e.a. (was: #1040 e.a), Bruce Lilly
    - Re: #1048 e.a., Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1048 e.a., Bruce Lilly
    - Re: #1048 e.a., Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1048 e.a., Russ Allbery
    - Re: #1048 e.a., Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1048 Injection-date, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Ticket status, USEFOR, Charles Lindsey
  - #1046 MIME boundary issues (was: Ticket status, USEFOR), Frank Ellermann
  - #1047 Path field delimiters and components (Re: Ticket status, USEFOR), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and components (Re: Ticket status, USEFOR), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and components (Re: Ticket status, USEFOR), Russ Allbery
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and components (Re: Ticket status, USEFOR), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and components (Re: Ticket status, USEFOR), Russ Allbery
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and components (Re: Ticket status, USEFOR), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and components (Re: Ticket status, USEFOR), Bruce Lilly
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and components (Re: Ticket status, USEFOR), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and components (Re: Ticket status, USEFOR), Russ Allbery
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and components (Re: Ticket status, USEFOR), Henry Spencer
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and components (Re: Ticket status, USEFOR), Russ Allbery
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and components (Re: Ticket status, USEFOR), Charles Lindsey
    - Shame vs Engineering, Forrest J. Cavalier III
    - Re: Shame vs Engineering, Henry Spencer
    - Re: Shame vs Engineering, Forrest J. Cavalier III
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and components, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and components, Russ Allbery
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and components, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and components, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: #1047 Path field delimiters and components, Frank Ellermann
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Ticket status, USEFOR, John Stanley
  - Re: Ticket status, USEFOR, Henry Spencer
  - Re: Ticket status, USEFOR, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: Ticket status, USEFOR, John Stanley
- Re: Ticket status, USEFOR, John Stanley
Anyone coming to Paris?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: Anyone coming to Paris?, Scott Hollenbeck
  - Re: Anyone coming to Paris?, Frank Ellermann
Admin: I'm back....., Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Using ABNF to document restrictions, Forrest J. Cavalier III
  - Re: Using ABNF to document restrictions, Charles Lindsey
- ABNF remarks hidden in message "Admin: I'm back.....", Bruce Lilly
  - Re: ABNF remarks hidden in message "Admin: I'm back.....", Harald Tveit Alvestrand
    - Re: ABNF remarks hidden in message "Admin: I'm back.....", Bruce Lilly
    - Re: ABNF remarks hidden in message "Admin: I'm back.....", Frank Ellermann
    - Re: ABNF remarks hidden in message "Admin: I'm back.....", Bruce Lilly
    - Re: ABNF remarks hidden in message "Admin: I'm back.....", Frank Ellermann
    - Re: ABNF remarks hidden in message "Admin: I'm back.....", Bruce Lilly
    - Re: ABNF remarks hidden in message "Admin: I'm back.....", Frank Ellermann
    - Re: ABNF remarks hidden in message "Admin: I'm back.....", Charles Lindsey
    - FWS-bugs in 2.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.5, 3.1.6, 3.2.3, 3.2.5, 3.2.6, 3.2.7, 3.2.11, 3.3.1 (was: ABNF remarks hidden in message "Admin: I'm back....."), Frank Ellermann
    - Re: FWS-bugs in 2.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.5, 3.1.6, 3.2.3, 3.2.5, 3.2.6, 3.2.7, 3.2.11, 3.3.1 (was: ABNF remarks hidden in message "Admin: I'm back....."), Bruce Lilly
    - Re: FWS-bugs in 2.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.5, 3.1.6, 3.2.3, 3.2.5, 3.2.6, 3.2.7, 3.2.11, 3.3.1, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: FWS-bugs in 2.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.5, 3.1.6, 3.2.3, 3.2.5, 3.2.6, 3.2.7, 3.2.11, 3.3.1, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: ABNF remarks hidden in message "Admin: I'm back.....", Bruce Lilly
    - USEPRO 7.9 gateway (was: ABNF remarks hidden in message "Admin: I'm back....."), Frank Ellermann
    - Re: USEPRO 7.9 gateway (was: ABNF remarks hidden in message "Admin: I'm back....."), Bruce Lilly
    - Re: USEPRO 7.9 gateway, Frank Ellermann
    - USEFOR cite by reference vs. rewriting syntax (Was Re: USEPRO 7.9 gateway), Bruce Lilly
    - Re: USEFOR cite by reference vs. rewriting syntax (Was Re: USEPRO 7.9 gateway), Henry Spencer
    - Re: USEFOR cite by reference vs. rewriting syntax (Was Re: USEPRO 7.9 gateway), Bruce Lilly
    - Re: USEFOR cite by reference vs. rewriting syntax (Was Re: USEPRO 7.9 gateway), Henry Spencer
    - Re: USEFOR cite by reference vs. rewriting syntax, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: USEFOR cite by reference vs. rewriting syntax, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: USEFOR cite by reference vs. rewriting syntax, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: USEFOR cite by reference vs. rewriting syntax, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: USEFOR cite by reference vs. rewriting syntax, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: USEFOR cite by reference vs. rewriting syntax, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: USEFOR cite by reference vs. rewriting syntax, Russ Allbery
    - Re: USEFOR cite by reference vs. rewriting syntax, Henry Spencer
    - Re: USEFOR cite by reference vs. rewriting syntax, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: ABNF remarks hidden in message "Admin: I'm back.....", Charles Lindsey
    - Re: ABNF remarks hidden in message "Admin: I'm back.....", Bruce Lilly
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
The old mail archives, Charles Lindsey
Re: [NNTP] 32 bit article counters, Steve Walker
- Re: [NNTP] 32 bit article counters, Steve Walker
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
Semantic header (field) Content, Charles Lindsey
- Re: Semantic header (field) Content, Russ Allbery
  - Re: Semantic header (field) Content, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: Semantic header (field) Content, Charles Lindsey
- Re: Semantic header (field) Content, Frank Ellermann
- =?us-ascii*la?q?Re:_?= Semantic header (field) Content, Bruce Lilly
  - Re: =?us-ascii*la?q?Re:_?= Semantic header (field) Content, Seth Breidbart
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Semantic header (field) Content, John Stanley
- Re: Semantic header (field) Content, John Stanley
New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Bruce Lilly
  - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Russ Allbery
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Russ Allbery
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Seth Breidbart
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Russ Allbery
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Henry Spencer
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Russ Allbery
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Russ Allbery
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Russ Allbery
    - News URIs (was New USEPRO path-identity text), Charles Lindsey
    - Re: News URIs, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Bill McQuillan
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Bruce Lilly
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Richard Clayton
  - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Richard Clayton
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Richard Clayton
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Richard Clayton
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Bruce Lilly
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Seth Breidbart
  - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Russ Allbery
    - RFC 2142 (was: Re: New USEPRO path-identity text), Ruud H.G. van Tol
    - Re: RFC 2142, Russ Allbery
    - Re: RFC 2142, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: RFC 2142, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: RFC 2142, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: RFC 2142 (was: Re: New USEPRO path-identity text), Bruce Lilly
    - Re: RFC 2142 (was: Re: New USEPRO path-identity text), Ned Freed
    - Re: RFC 2142 (was: Re: New USEPRO path-identity text), Bruce Lilly
    - Re: RFC 2142 (was: Re: New USEPRO path-identity text), Ned Freed
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: New USEPRO path-identity text, John Stanley
  - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, John Stanley
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, John Stanley
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, John Stanley
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, John Stanley
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, John Stanley
  - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, John Stanley
  - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Steve Walker
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Frank Ellermann
  - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Steve Walker
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Steve Walker
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Frank Ellermann
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, John Stanley
  - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, John Stanley
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, John Stanley
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, John Stanley
  - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Richard Clayton
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Richard Clayton
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, John Stanley
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, John Stanley
  - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Bruce Lilly
    - Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, Charles Lindsey
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, John Stanley
- Re: New USEPRO path-identity text, John Stanley

Page 6 of 10
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.