Archive of ietf-usefor, by thread
Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-usefor
Page 9 of 9
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
- Re: Issues outstanding, (continued)
- Re: Issues outstanding,
John Stanley
- Issues outstanding,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Issues outstanding,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Issues outstanding,
Alexey Melnikov
- =?utf-8*de-de-1996?b?RG9uYXVkYW1wZnNjaGlmZmZhaHJ0c2thcGl0w6Ruc23DvHR6ZQ==?=,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: =?utf-8*de-de-?b?RG9uYXVkYW1wZnNjaGlmZmZhaHJ0c2thcGl0w6Ruc23DvHR6ZQ==?=,
Charles Lindsey
- =?utf-8*de-de-1996?b?RG9uYXVkYW1wZnNjaGlmZmZhaHJ0c2thcGl0w6Ruc23DvHR6ZQ==?=,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: =?utf-8*de-de-1996?b?RG9uYXVkYW1wZnNjaGlmZmZhaHJ0c2thcGl0w6Ruc23DvHR6ZQ==?=,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Babble from Frank Ellermann <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Issues outstanding,
Charles Lindsey
- Broken Mesage-ID syntax (was: Issues outstanding),
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Broken Mesage-ID syntax (was: Issues outstanding),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Broken Message-ID syntax,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Broken Message-ID syntax,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Broken Message-ID syntax,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Broken Message-ID syntax,
Charles Lindsey
- Fixed (was: Broken Message-ID syntax),
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Fixed (was: Broken Message-ID syntax),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Fixed (was: Broken Message-ID syntax),
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Fixed (was: Broken Message-ID syntax),
Charles Lindsey
- Again broken (was: Fixed),
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Again broken (was: Fixed),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Again broken,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Again broken,
Russ Allbery
- Re: Again broken,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Again broken,
Forrest J. Cavalier III
- Re: Again broken,
Charles Lindsey
- CFWS (was: Again broken),
Frank Ellermann
- Re: CFWS (was: Again broken),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: CFWS,
Russ Allbery
- Re: CFWS,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: CFWS,
Russ Allbery
- Re: CFWS,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: ***SPAM-3*** Re: CFWS,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: CFWS,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: CFWS,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: CFWS,
Russ Allbery
- Re: CFWS,
Forrest J. Cavalier III
- Re: CFWS,
Russ Allbery
- Re: CFWS,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: CFWS,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: CFWS,
Kai Henningsen
- Re: CFWS,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: CFWS,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: CFWS,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Again broken,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Again broken,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Again broken,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Again broken,
Frank Ellermann
- 2045 ABNF (was: Again broken),
Frank Ellermann
- Re: 2045 ABNF (was: Again broken),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: 2045 ABNF,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: ***SPAM-3*** Re: 2045 ABNF,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: 2045 ABNF,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: 2045 ABNF,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: 2045 ABNF,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: 2045 ABNF,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: 2045 ABNF,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: 2045 ABNF,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: 2045 ABNF,
Frank Ellermann
- USEFOR ABNF check,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Fixed,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Fixed,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Fixed,
Frank Ellermann
- Issues outstanding,
John Stanley
- Re: Issues outstanding,
John Stanley
- Re: Issues outstanding,
John Stanley
- Re: Issues outstanding,
John Stanley
- Ad hominem,
John Stanley
- Re: Address Validation,
John Stanley
- Address Validation (Was: Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-02),
John Stanley
- Re: msg-id,
John Stanley
- Re: msg-id,
Seth Breidbart
- Re: msg-id,
Thorfinn
- Re: msg-id,
Charles Lindsey
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: msg-id,
John Stanley
- Re: msg-id,
John Stanley
- Re: msg-id,
John Stanley
- Re: msg-id,
John Stanley
- Re: msg-id,
John Stanley
- Re: msg-id,
John Stanley
- Re: msg-id,
John Stanley
- Re: msg-id,
John Stanley
- Re: msg-id,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: msg-id,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: msg-id,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: msg-id,
Charles Lindsey
- To do (was: msg-id),
Frank Ellermann
- Re: To do (was: msg-id),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: To do (was: msg-id),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: To do,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: To do,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: To do,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: To do,
Charles Lindsey
- mdomain vs. id-right again (was: To do),
Frank Ellermann
- Re: mdomain vs. id-right again (was: To do),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: mdomain vs. id-right again,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: mdomain vs. id-right again,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: mdomain vs. id-right again,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: mdomain vs. id-right again,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: mdomain vs. id-right again,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: To do,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: To do,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: To do,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: To do,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: To do,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: To do,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: To do,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: To do,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: To do,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: To do,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: To do,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: To do,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: To do,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: To do,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: To do,
Frank Ellermann
- IMC ietf-usefor archive,
John Stanley
- [no subject],
John Stanley
- draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-02,
Charles Lindsey
- <Possible follow-ups>
- draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-02,
John Stanley
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-02,
John Stanley
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-02,
John Stanley
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-02,
John Stanley
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-02,
John Stanley
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-02,
John Stanley
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-02,
John Stanley
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-02,
John Stanley
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-02,
John Stanley
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-02,
John Stanley
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-02,
John Stanley
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-02,
John Stanley
- FWS problem,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: FWS problem,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: FWS problem,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: FWS problem,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: FWS problem,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: FWS problem,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: FWS problem,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: FWS problem,
Henry Spencer
- Re: FWS problem,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: FWS problem,
Henry Spencer
- Re: ***SPAM-3*** Re: FWS problem,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: ***SPAM-3*** Re: FWS problem,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: ***SPAM-3*** Re: FWS problem,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: FWS problem,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: FWS problem,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: FWS problem,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: FWS problem,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: FWS problem,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: FWS problem,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: FWS problem,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: FWS problem,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: FWS problem,
Charles Lindsey
- Archive mangling of record traffic...,
John Stanley
- Re: poll methodology,
John Stanley
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-02.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- msg-id,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: msg-id,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: msg-id,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: msg-id,
Henry Spencer
- Re: msg-id,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: msg-id,
Henry Spencer
- Re: msg-id,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: msg-id,
Henry Spencer
- Re: msg-id,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: msg-id,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: msg-id,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: msg-id,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: msg-id,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: msg-id,
Henry Spencer
- Re: msg-id,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: msg-id,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: msg-id,
Russ Allbery
- Re: msg-id,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: msg-id,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: msg-id,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: msg-id,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: msg-id,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: msg-id,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: msg-id,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01.txt,
Charles Lindsey
- Path Punctuation summary,
Charles Lindsey
- Usefor Web Site,
Charles Lindsey
- Header Table,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: relay checking,
John Stanley
- [no subject],
John Stanley
- USEFOR WG meeting in Washington, DC,
Alexey Melnikov
- Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Russ Allbery
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Henry Spencer
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Russ Allbery
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Russ Allbery
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Russ Allbery
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Russ Allbery
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Russ Allbery
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Russ Allbery
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Thorfinn
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Thorfinn
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Russ Allbery
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Alexey Melnikov
- Message not available
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: ***SPAM-3*** Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Alexey Melnikov
- Is this a STraw Poll? (was Standardize Complaints-To as deployed),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Is this a STraw Poll?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Is this a STraw Poll? (was Standardize Complaints-To as deployed),
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Is this a STraw Poll? (was Standardize Complaints-To as deployed),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Is this a STraw Poll? (was Standardize Complaints-To as deployed),
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Is this a STraw Poll? (was Standardize Complaints-To as deployed),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Is this a STraw Poll?,
Russ Allbery
- Re: Is this a STraw Poll?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Is this a STraw Poll?,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Is this a STraw Poll?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Is this a STraw Poll?,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: ***SPAM-3*** Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: ***SPAM-3*** Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: ***SPAM-3*** Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Bruce Lilly
- Does 2231 break MIME 1.0? (was: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?),
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0? (was: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?),
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0? (was: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?),
ned . freed
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Claus Färber
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
ned . freed
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
ned . freed
- Re: Does 2231 break MIME 1.0?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: ***SPAM-3*** Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: ***SPAM-3*** Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Claus Färber
- Re: ***SPAM-3*** Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Bruce Lilly
- RE: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Scott Hollenbeck
- RE: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- poll methodology (was Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?),
Henry Spencer
- Re: poll methodology (was Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: poll methodology (was Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?),
Henry Spencer
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Russ Allbery
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Archive (was: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?),
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Archive (was: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?),
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Archive,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Archive,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Archive,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Russ Allbery
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Richard Clayton
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Russ Allbery
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: Standardize Complaints-To as deployed?,
Frank Ellermann
BUSINESS PROPOSAL!!,
petergordon
Re: Issues with MIME-style parameters,
Bruce Lilly
Usefor/usepro conflicts.,
John Stanley
<draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01.txt>,
John Stanley
Thank you,
Bill Davidsen
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Russ Allbery
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Henry Spencer
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Russ Allbery
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Russ Allbery
- relay checking (was Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01),
Henry Spencer
- Re: relay checking,
Russ Allbery
- Re: relay checking,
Henry Spencer
- Re: relay checking,
Russ Allbery
- Re: relay checking,
Bill Davidsen
- Re: relay checking,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: relay checking,
Russ Allbery
- Re: relay checking,
Henry Spencer
- Re: relay checking,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: relay checking,
Henry Spencer
- Re: relay checking,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: relay checking,
Henry Spencer
- Re: relay checking,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: relay checking,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: relay checking,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Russ Allbery
- control propagation (was Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01),
Henry Spencer
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Kai Henningsen
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Russ Allbery
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Russ Allbery
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Charles Lindsey
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Russ Allbery
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Bruce Lilly
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Bill Davidsen
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Henry Spencer
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Bill Davidsen
- Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Henry Spencer
Re: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-01,
Bill Davidsen
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usefor-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
The great mailing list muddle,
Charles Lindsey
Message fragmentation via message/partial and news-specific header fields,
Bruce Lilly
[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-usefor-usepro-00.txt],
Alexey Melnikov
Re: New UseFor headers (was Re: Document definitions),
Alexey Melnikov
Welcome to the UseFor WG mailing list,
Alexey Melnikov
Page 9 of 9
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail
Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections
to this Web page, please send them to
phoffman@imc.org.