[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Merging RRP and Whois

To: George Belotsky <george@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Merging RRP and Whois
From: Shane Kerr <shane@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:12:24 +0100 (CET)
Cc: ietf-provreg@xxxxxxxx, ietf-whois@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-whois/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-whois.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-whois-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-whois@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, George Belotsky wrote:

> The assumption of a centralized store would be made at the 
> protocol level.  The underlying implementation could well
> be distributed.  Assuming a distributed database at the
> protocol level would complicate the client.

Not necessarily.  HTTP+HTML implements a distributed database with an
extremely simple client (until you decide to render the HTML, I
suppose) - not that it can't be done wrong (see "RWhois").

Shane

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Merging RRP and Whois
  - From: Mark Kosters

References:
- Re: Merging RRP and Whois
  - From: George Belotsky

Prev by Date: Re: Merging RRP and Whois
Next by Date: RE: New Standard for Whois
Previous by thread: Re: Merging RRP and Whois
Next by thread: Re: Merging RRP and Whois
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread