[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: !43 bar BOF

To: ietf-whois@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: !43 bar BOF
From: Andrew Newton <anewton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 14:04:19 -0400
In-reply-to: <>; from anewton@research.netsol.com on Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 08:07:11PM -0400
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-whois/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-whois.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-whois-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-whois@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 08:07:11PM -0400, Andrew Newton wrote:
> 
> To reduce the noise in the Whoisfix BOF about non-port 43 alternatives
> and ideas, how many people would be interested in a !43 bar BOF?

For anyone interested, we plan to assemble on Wednesday at 5:30 after
the last session.  Meeting place is the entrance to the terminal room
and then on to a pub of concensus choice.

-- 
Andrew Newton
VeriSign Applied Research
anewton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: !43 bar BOF
  - From: Jaap Akkerhuis

References:
- RE: IETF-51 WhoisFix BoF Announcement
  - From: Hollenbeck, Scott
- !43 bar BOF
  - From: Andrew Newton

Prev by Date: Re: IETF-51 WhoisFix BoF Announcement
Next by Date: Re: IETF-51 WhoisFix BoF Announcement
Previous by thread: !43 bar BOF
Next by thread: Re: !43 bar BOF
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread