[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...)

To: Larry Masinter <lmm@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...)
From: Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 18:36:45 +0100
Cc: MURATA Makoto <murata.makoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Connolly <connolly@xxxxxx>, timbl@xxxxxx, simonstl@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ietf-xml-mime@xxxxxxx, Tsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xsl-editors@xxxxxx
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-mime/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-xml-mime.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-xml-mime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: W3C
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-xml-mime@xxxxxxx

Larry Masinter wrote:

> The point is that the general question of "this message body, which
> MIME type should I use" can always have multiple answers (since
> application/octet-stream usually applies, for example).

Yes. My concern is that the question "is this thing, returned as
application/xml, actually xml or not" should *not* have multiple
answers.

--
Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...)
  - From: MURATA Makoto

References:
- RE: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...)
  - From: Larry Masinter

Prev by Date: RE: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...)
Next by Date: Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...)
Previous by thread: RE: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...)
Next by thread: Re: External parsed entities (Re: Inconsistency between IETF and W3C...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread