> >why? is there really much value in a default treatment > of text/* xml > >documents as plain text? (the default doesn't seem to > work well in > >practice for text/html) or is xml really likely to be used for > >image/*, audio/*, video/*, or model/* content?
I think that this actually argues in favor of 'xml/' as a top level.
------------ Graham Klyne (GK@xxxxxxx)