[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion

To: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>, ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion
From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 13:19:58 -0500
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx>, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx, ietf-xml-mime@xxxxxxx, ietf-822@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-mime/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-xml-mime.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-xml-mime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <Your message of "Mon, 20 Mar 2000 09:39:08 PST." <>
Sender: owner-ietf-xml-mime@xxxxxxxxxxxx

At 01:14 PM 3/20/00 -0500, Keith Moore wrote:
>by contrast, the -xml frob
>coupled with the desire for content-negotiation languages (http accept
>and conneg) to recognize anything that is XML does break things.
>I'm just trying to minimize breakage.

Could you please explain in detail what gets broken here?

I've yet to hear of a meaningful 'breaking', and I'd like a concrete example.

As far as I can tell, -xml doesn't interfere with existing systems at all.

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth
http://www.simonstl.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion
  - From: ned . freed
- Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion
  - From: Keith Moore

References:
- Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion
  - From: ned . freed
- Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion
  - From: Keith Moore

Prev by Date: Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion
Next by Date: Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion
Previous by thread: Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion
Next by thread: Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread