[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion
> At 01:14 PM 3/20/00 -0500, Keith Moore wrote:
> >by contrast, the -xml frob
> >coupled with the desire for content-negotiation languages (http accept
> >and conneg) to recognize anything that is XML does break things.
> >I'm just trying to minimize breakage.
> Could you please explain in detail what gets broken here?
> I've yet to hear of a meaningful 'breaking', and I'd like a concrete example.
> As far as I can tell, -xml doesn't interfere with existing systems at all.
I note in passing that we've already registered some XML-based types
with an "XML" suffix, and no problems have been reported with this