[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Finishing the XML-tagging discussion

> ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> > AFAIK, no. I don't see a reason to change an existing registration in any
> > case -- when we've made changes to the media types system in the past
> > we've grandfathered old registrations that don't "fit" the new rules.

> Not quite the issue.  VRML, which is not XML-compatible, is application/vrml.
> If VRML is reformulated to be XML-compatible (in a new version), do we
> then register application/vrml-xml?  I think we do.

Sure, and this is entirely consistent since what you're describing is a new
media type. (An old VRML handler certainly won't be able to process it...)