[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Finishing(!) the XML-tagging discussion



At 11:59 AM 3/22/00 +0900, Martin J. Duerst wrote:
>should definitely be
>
>>accept-features: (&((language=de),(language=fr)))

A nit, before this example becomes received reality:  the way to express
this in CONNEG is:

accept-features: (| (language=de) (language=fr) )

(i.e. use logical OR, fewer brackets in this case, and no comma between
options.  The basic syntax is lifted from LDAP search filters.)

Um, the point of the example was to have something that _doesn't_ exist. Hence the use of AND, not OR.

Ned