[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: model/uml+xml

To: Daniel Biddle <deltab@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: model/uml+xml
From: "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 02:11:21 +0900
Cc: ietf-xml-mime@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0101101437330.20741-100000@charizard.blazing fast.net>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-mime/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-xml-mime.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-xml-mime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-xml-mime@xxxxxxxxxxxx

At 01/01/10 16:04 +0000, Daniel Biddle wrote:

I don't believe UML has models in the sense RFC 2077 defines. For
instance, UML models don't "have scaling or calibration factors which are
related to physical units (force, momentum, time, velocity, acceleration,
size, etc.)." [RFC 2077 s.2]

I agree.

Maybe you should change that example to something more plausible.
(Sorry, I haven't found any good candidates yet.)

Something like model/x3d ?

Regards, Martin.

Prev by Date: model/uml+xml
Next by Date: RE; THANK YOU
Previous by thread: model/uml+xml
Next by thread: RE; THANK YOU
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread